<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Enbridge releases tanker plans for Kitimat</title>
	<atom:link href="http://alisonbate.ca/2010/06/08/enbridge-releases-tanker-plans-for-kitimat/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://alisonbate.ca/2010/06/08/enbridge-releases-tanker-plans-for-kitimat/</link>
	<description>Journalist, writer and teacher</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 16:37:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://alisonbate.ca/2010/06/08/enbridge-releases-tanker-plans-for-kitimat/comment-page-1/#comment-6901</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 01:44:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alisonbate.ca/?p=491#comment-6901</guid>
		<description>Hi Chris

I’m glad you encouraged me to update this post, especially now the hearings have just started in Kitimat. Some risk assessments have been carried out and they’re pretty tedious to read, but I’ll try and do a new post within the next week or so, when I have more time. 

However, from a quick scout around, the marine protection and emergency response plans are still a bit sketchy. Here&#039;s the link to Enbridge’s main Marine Risk Assessment summary:
http://www.northerngateway.ca/environmental-responsibility/marine-assessment-and-our-first-response-plan/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Chris</p>
<p>I’m glad you encouraged me to update this post, especially now the hearings have just started in Kitimat. Some risk assessments have been carried out and they’re pretty tedious to read, but I’ll try and do a new post within the next week or so, when I have more time. </p>
<p>However, from a quick scout around, the marine protection and emergency response plans are still a bit sketchy. Here&#8217;s the link to Enbridge’s main Marine Risk Assessment summary:<br />
<a href="http://www.northerngateway.ca/environmental-responsibility/marine-assessment-and-our-first-response-plan/" rel="nofollow">http://www.northerngateway.ca/environmental-responsibility/marine-assessment-and-our-first-response-plan/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris shearman</title>
		<link>http://alisonbate.ca/2010/06/08/enbridge-releases-tanker-plans-for-kitimat/comment-page-1/#comment-6889</link>
		<dc:creator>chris shearman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 18:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alisonbate.ca/?p=491#comment-6889</guid>
		<description>Thanks Allison, I came across your article today while trying to get some back ground on this proposed project. Any updates? Conspicuously absent from this plan is any emergency response protocol.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Allison, I came across your article today while trying to get some back ground on this proposed project. Any updates? Conspicuously absent from this plan is any emergency response protocol.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

